This page was last updated on September 10, 2010.
Unfixable; Editorial; Beaver County Times; September 10, 2010. At the time I published this critique, the URL for the editorial
The Times has published at least 55 anti-smoking-on-private-property editorials since March 2005 and this is the third smoking-related editorial in seven days.
What is the Times obsession with smoking? I’m a nonsmoker and always have been. When I choose to be in areas that permit smoking, tobacco smoke occasionally burns my eyes, irritates my throat, and I hate the stink of smoke on my clothes. I’ve also had friends get annoyed with me when I wouldn’t allow them to smoke in my car and residence. Despite my dislike of tobacco smoke, I wouldn’t dream of telling someone that he could not permit smoking on his private property.
The Times activity on this issue presents a teachable moment. Both of us don’t like tobacco smoke. A conservative approaches the problem by addressing his own behavior and property. In other words, I choose not to smoke, don’t allow smoking on my property, and tend to avoid places that allow smoking. A leftist approaches the problem by seeking to impose anti-smoking laws and is not happy until he has imposed his will on everyone else, even on their private property.
© 2004-2010 Robert W. Cox, all rights reserved.