Harold L. Householder – 11/29/09
This page was last updated on January 2,
2010. Altmire cares only for special interests; Harold L. Householder; Beaver County Times; November 29, 2009. The two Householder letters (here and here) I know of were Bush-bashing exercises. Below is a detailed critique of the subject letter. “U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire voted against health care reform.” [RWC] Not exactly. Mr. Altmire voted
against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and President Obama’s idea of
“health care reform.” Remember, in the healthcare debate, “reform” is
leftyspeak for a government-run, taxpayer-funded healthcare monopoly.
Lefties refer to any reform that would return our healthcare system to a
free market as supporting the status quo. Please read my paper
entitled “Healthcare.” To be clear, though I applaud Mr. Altmire
opposing
H.R. 3962 so far, I have no illusions his idea of reform is anything
like mine and ultimately I expect him to vote for some bill that would be
both a huge lurch to the left and unconstitutional. At the end of the
day, Mr. Altmire is a lefty and I’m a conservative. “He also has voted against the energy policy that tried to free us from foreign oil and stop global warming. He voted against the stimulus package that stopped the recession from getting worse.” [RWC] Does Mr. Householder really believe
the cap-and-tax bill was about “free[ing] us from foreign oil and stop[ping]
global warming?” It’s all about consolidating more and more power in
government. Though it was a wrong vote,
Mr. Altmire voted
for the so-called “stimulus package.”
If the so-called “stimulus package ... stopped the recession from getting
worse,” why did unemployment keep increasing? “In Barack Obama we finally have a president who is boldly trying to bring our country back from the train wreck of the Bush years.” [RWC] Sorry, Mr. Householder, but
the policies that led to the subprime meltdown were all programs pushed
by Democrats. “I voted for Altmire thinking anyone was a step up from Republican Melissa Hart. I was wrong.” [RWC] I believe Mr. Householder’s idea of
“thinking” is simply to make sure the candidate is a Democrat. “Obama needs a real Democrat in Congress to help him. We Democrats need someone to step up and run against Altmire in the primary.” [RWC] “[A] real Democrat?” I guess an
Americans for Democratic Action Liberal Quotient of 88% isn’t good enough
for Mr. Householder. “It is time we have a representative who will work for the type of change we must have, not someone like Altmire, who looks out for the powerful special interests.” [RWC] If Mr. Altmire “looks out for the
powerful special interests,” why didn’t he vote the way labor union
management wanted him to vote? Perhaps Mr. Householder doesn’t believe
labor union management counts as a “powerful special interest.” © 2004-2009 Robert W. Cox, all rights reserved. |